LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for SW-L Archives


SW-L Archives

SW-L Archives


SW-L@LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SW-L Home

SW-L Home

SW-L  September 2010

SW-L September 2010

Subject:

Re: QUESTION...Which do you prefer in ASL?

From:

Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

SignWriting List: Read and Write Sign Languages

Date:

Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:47:44 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (105 lines)

I just looked at an English dictionary to see how it handles numbering in the thousands. It doesn't have commas, so the consensus is leaning towards doing 1-0-0-0 and 1-0-21. Will have to see what more people say. ;-)

Adam 

On Sep 22, 2010, at 2:21 PM, "Valerie Sutton" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> SignWriting List
> September 22, 2010
> 
> Hi Adam!
> OK. Thank your friend at Gally for the information about English page numbers ;-)
> 
> But what happened in the first 7 chapters of the Gospel According to John - I put in the C in, and now I need to take it out - 
> 
> but what about the 1000's...can you at least give me a suggestion? Should I write? 10-21 for 1021? Or do I write the sign for 1000 and then do 21? Or do I go 1-0-21? smile we are getting there faster than one realizes - the era of big SignWriting books are upon us ;-)
> 
> Val ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Adam Frost wrote:
> 
>> I would say 100 would be 1-C just like 21 is 21 rather than 2-1. I guess we could do a "1-9" representation just like English does now, but a friend of mine made a comment about that. When English was first written, page numbers were spelled out. Then it went through several changes when numbers got larger and more complex. That is where we are right now with ASL. I guess we just have to try it out for a while and see what becomes the standard. ;-)
>> 
>> Adam
>> 
>> On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:11 PM, "Valerie Sutton" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> SignWriting List
>>> September 22, 2010
>>> 
>>> Hello Adam!
>>> Thanks for this great feedback, and please thank your friends around you at Gallaudet Univ for their feedback too...so Page Numbers should not be viewed as "counting", but instead are "names" or "labels" for pages...
>>> 
>>> How would you write just plain 100, 200, 300 and so forth...1-0-0 or 1C?
>>> 
>>> How would you write plain 1000, 2000, 3000?
>>> 
>>> How would you write 1001, 1018, 1162?
>>> 
>>> Val ;-)
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Adam Frost wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have been curious about the views of others on the topic. I can see everyone's point because it depends on what you feel page numbers are. If you feel that pages are counted, then the use of C would be correct (or even the pulled back bend like X for 100). If you feel that the numbers are the names of the pages, then it is the representation of the individual numbers. I am just taking the stand point of how someone in a classroom would tell everyone what page to turn to in a book. So with the page 101 example, I almost always see 1-0-1 rather than 1-C-0-1. 
>>>> 
>>>> I was also asking some friends here, it seems that they feel that a page is a name rather than being counted. Also, when you look at pages numbered, you don't see it written out as one hundred one, which is what they (and I) feel that 1-C-0-1 would be more equivalent.
>>>> 
>>>> Just my take on it. ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> Adam
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Valerie Sutton wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> SignWriting List
>>>>> September 21, 2010
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Kelly Jo and everyone!
>>>>> I really appreciate your feedback...and hope others will also tell me how they feel...
>>>>> 
>>>>> ASL page numbers have really be a useful tool to start people reading SignWriting...everyone has to look down to find the page number, and when they do, they have the Arabic numeral on one side of the page, and the ASL page number on the other side of the page, and most ASL signers sit there and study the writing of the page numbers in ASL and don't even realize that they are getting reading experience from that...so it is one of many small ways to build reading skills in SignWriting...
>>>>> 
>>>>> But ASL page numbers are also different than when we are actually signing in sentences, because they need to be short and easy to glance at, to find what page you are on...
>>>>> 
>>>>> So for example, although I know ASL signers pull the hand back as you say, I wonder if for page numbers, that pull-back movement isn't too much detail? But if you are writing the number in the middle of an ASL sentence, then it would be a good idea to write the arrow pulling the hand back, to show accuracy...it is a question of how much detail we put into the writing of page numbers...
>>>>> 
>>>>> So I would love to see your writing of the page numbers in ASL in SignPuddle, Kelly Jo - thank you for offering this -
>>>>> 
>>>>> For right now, to explain - I already have numbers 1-181 in the ASL dictionary in SignPuddle, following the rather formal writing with the full C for 100 (the first example in the attached)....and now I considering adding two more alternatives for book designers to choose from...that way there are choices...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Which of the three feels best for you? (please see attached)
>>>>> 
>>>>> ... imagine telling someone in ASL that you live in hotel room 181...which writing would feel best? I wonder if the third one, although not detailed, isn't the way most people would sign HOTEL ROOM 181? just three numbers 1...8...1 in a row? because it is a label on a door, rather than a part of a sentence? think of this at the bottom of page very tiny...
>>>>> 
>>> <181_ASL.png>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 8:35 PM, KJ wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Val,
>>>>>> My pleasure - it's an interesting question!  I'm sitting here trying out different ways to sign 3-digit numbers, trying to feel which one is most natural.  For the 101, I would use the spelling with the C in the middle, definitely.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What I find really interesting, as I look at that spelling of 135, is that it feels like it should be a four-digit number because there are four handshapes!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The "hundred" - whether it's signed with the full C or just the crooked fingers - is always pulled back toward the body a little, which is why I included the movement arrow in my writing.  It also makes the two handshapes look like one unit, which is how it feels when I sign it - 1-C is one word, and the last two numbers are separate words.  Just my opinion . . . but I knew a Deaf child who actually signed 1-C-0-1 for 101!  It's like the C is a suffix on the hundreds digit.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I could write some other numbers the way I feel I'd sign them and save them into SignPuddle online, if you'd like. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anyone else on the list have an opinion about this?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> KJ
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager