I'll take a look. I believe the conversion package does not contain the
latest bug fixes.
On 9/7/11 12:59 PM, Alan Post wrote:
> It seems either the conversion or rendering process has a bug that
> is dropping part of the sign information.
The problem is in the conversion.
> If you'll permit me to hazard a guess, I would say that the act of
> including the same symbol-part twice introduces an error.
I believe you are right.
> The sign in SignPuddle doesn't seem to be affected, however. How
> fascinating! What is happening?
The conversion package is a copy of the SignPuddle conversion routine.
There were a few last minute bug fixes that did not make it into the
conversion package. I'll fix that now.