LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for SW-L Archives


SW-L Archives

SW-L Archives


SW-L@LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SW-L Home

SW-L Home

SW-L  September 2012

SW-L September 2012

Subject:

Re: signpuddle entry disappeared?

From:

Steve Slevinski <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

SignWriting List: Read and Write Sign Languages

Date:

Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:12:35 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)

On 9/27/12 3:28 PM, MARIA GALEA wrote:
> Wow, what has happened here is really interesting, and it's something
> that's been on my mind for a long time.

Hi Maria,

I really appreciate the thought and reflection you've put into 
understanding SignWriting and SignPuddle.


> In the SLLING list there was a discussion about HamNoSys and SignWriting -
> and sign linguists were criticizing SignPuddle Dictionaries for not being
> traditional 'dictionaries' in the linguistic sense (1 lexeme: 1 entry)-
> and they are right - but this does not mean that SignPuddles are not a
> rich resource in themselves.

I use some words differently that linguists. I am very happy with the 
SignPuddle corpus, which is not a linguistic corpus.


> They store written sign language entries not
> just by linguists but by common folk, and this makes all entries in
> SignPuddle an invaluable resource - since for a writing system to be truly
> a writing system it needs to be accepted, and written by a community of
> language users.
Agreed!  I hope to encourage people to write, learn from others, and 
develop their own unique style.

> If SignPuddle was a linguistic database, it would lose its
> uniqueness. What makes SignPuddle so strong - paradoxically is what
> linguists criticize as weak - the way data is entered into Puddle in such
> a non-academic way : i see this a major strength :)

The way the data is entered creates many possibilities.  In the future, 
I would like to normalize the data by removing meaningless spelling 
differences.  This process would have to be semi automated with human 
interaction.

I agree that alternate spellings should be kept.  Spelling mistakes are 
interesting but should be marked as containing an error.

> I see the public SignPuddles as editing tools for anyone using SignWriting
> who wishes to write and store SignWritten entries in a particular
> language.
>
> However my question now: are the public SignPuddles truly public? To have
> an editor in a public SignPuddle 'respelling' and deleting entries to me
> indicates that they are not very public.

This is one of the great reasons to integrate with MediaWiki.  These 
types of issues can be discussed directly where they are happening. 
SignPuddle only has a limited rights hierarchy.  We have backups and 
recovery, but we do not keep extensive logs.

> It might be a good time to
> re-think what the aims and purposes of Public SignPuddles are. I can
> understand that an editor would have to remove 'mistakes' etc..but the
> mistakes are his/her interpretation of mistakes - at this early stage the
> development of a writing system..mistakes may very well NOT be mistakes,
> just different ways of writing the same thing..sometimes very different
> ways but still the variance of writing would provide data which is
> valuable for anyone studying the evolution of a writing system such as
> SignWriting.

This ultimately becomes a bureaucracy problem.  I do not believe this 
type of problem is widespread in the puddles.  Again, MediaWiki has the 
needed features built in.  A sign language Wiktionary can handle this 
nicely.  Most of SignPuddle Online should be open and inviting.  A few 
of the puddles are private.

> Maybe what could be done is that the public SignPuddles remain or become
> truly public, so that all entries are allowed to stay there..BUT then of
> course I understand that the actual editors (with their different reasons
> and targets for using SignWriting) cannot use these the Public SignPuddles
> as they are, but they would take whatever they wish from the public
> SignPuddles to their semi-private puddle (that can be viewed but not
> edited).

The public puddles should always be open and available under an open 
license. Private puddles can be initialized using any of the open puddles.

> this is another clear indicatin that signwriting is becoming widespread.

Yes indeed.  Faster and faster.

I've recently had some success integrating SignWriting with CSS. 
SignWriting Rich Text that behaves like text is not far away.
http://ase.wikipedia.wmflabs.org/wiki/ASE:Community_portal#Basic_CSS

Regards,
-Steve

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.VALENCIACOLLEGE.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager