 |
 |
I would use a brush rather than a rub, because the dominant hand does lose contact with the non-dom. Other than that, yes, looks good to me. cherie >________________________________ > From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> >To: [log in to unmask] >Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:41 AM >Subject: Re: A Pear Story > > >I guess I should come out of the wood works for a short while to put in my two cents. :-) > > >Cherie Wren, I agree that we can't honestly say that someone is wrong in their writing without some investigation of whether it be regional variation, individual variation, or even writing style. I have seen a lot of sign variations partly because that is my field of study as well as it being my native language that I live, breath, read, write, sign, analyze, and teach everyday. I will be the first to admit, however, that even I haven't seen every variation out there because new ones pop up all the time. Having said that, let's have a continuation of discussing. :-) > > > >Kelly Jo, I personally don't see anything with the arrows in the writing that Charles chose, which was written by Natasha. I am not sure if I understand what you are trying to say, though. You say that the arrows should be going to the left rather than the right? Would this writing be what you suggest? > > > > >Or are you meaning this writing? > > > > >And, Cherie, you mentioned another way of signing it. Is this close to what you meant? > > > > >Now, if I were writing this sign myself, I would have chosen a different palm orientation for the non-dominate hand. In fact, that is the only difference that I would personally make to Natasha's writing in SignPuddle. (Ok, maybe I would change the placing of some of the symbols, but it is basically the same. GRIN) > > > > >Maybe 2¢ has gone up because of inflation? ;-) > > >Adam > >