The < indicate the hand opening suddenly, I thought twice. Perhaps i was misinterpreting CW's intention as whoever CW is does not seem to pipe up and say. I think I've got something wrong here.
I cannot get into SignPuddle Brazil at all today. It says that signbank.org is down.
[log in to unmask]
Clear writing moves business forward.
--- On Sun, 2/24/13, Stefan Wöhrmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
From: Stefan Wöhrmann <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: AW: Many
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Sunday, February 24, 2013, 7:58 AM
yes I agree – the hands look good now. On the other hand I am very surprised to read that you want the reader to understand that your intention is a “double movement”.
I saw this spelling never bevore to indicate a double movement. I would rather prefer to movement-arrows for each hand. I was wondering and thought that you focus on rocket-speed writing two dynamic symbols ..;-)
Von: SignWriting List: Read and Write Sign Languages [mailto:SW-[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Charles Butler
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013 12:12
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: Many
I think this is correct now. The double < on both hands indicates a double movement. Is there any way to delete the other sign in error. I thought I was an editor on SignPuddle for ASL. One cannot produce CW's original entry without error.