Print

Print


I agree :-)

 

Best

Stefan

 

  _____  

Von: SignWriting List: Read and Write Sign Languages
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Adam Frost
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013 00:14
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE

 

It doesn't really bother me if the dynamics are there or not. If you are
going to put the < on both hands, then you should also put ~ on both as
well. But at least the hands are doable now. :-)

 

Adam

 

On Feb 23, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Charles Butler wrote:






Sometimes you can't see it for the trees. I don't think that one strictly
needs the < but it somehow makes them feel more lively.
<http://www.signbank.org/signpuddle2.0/glyphogram.php?text=AS20300S20300S2f9
00S26600S26610S2f720S2f720S14c00S14c08S2fb00M29x51S14c006xn31S2fb00n7xn4S14c
08n28xn31S20300n23x36S2030010x36S266009x3S26610n24x3S2f900n5x39S2f72012xn51S
2f720n22xn50&pad=10&name=many> 



Charles Butler
[log in to unmask]
240-764-5748
Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Sat, 2/23/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 11:01 AM

Look at the 5 hands. They should be switched. 

 

Adam


On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:57 AM, "Charles Butler" <[log in to unmask]
<x-msg:[log in to unmask]> > wrote:


Is not the double articulation on the < sufficient? I could read it. Or
maybe I was intuiting what it was saying. Should the < have been on both
hands? 


Charles Butler
[log in to unmask] <x-msg:[log in to unmask]> 
240-764-5748
Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Sat, 2/23/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]
<x-msg:[log in to unmask]> > wrote:


From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]
<x-msg:[log in to unmask]> >
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
<x-msg:[log in to unmask]> 
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 10:47 AM

It would be the sign MANY. ;-)

 

Adam


On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:32 AM, "Charles Butler" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:


I have lost track of what I actually loaded. Here are the two pieces of my
email. What sign are you referring to? They were all taken off of
SignPuddle. Which one needs to be fixed? 



Charles Butler
[log in to unmask]
240-764-5748
Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 3:41 PM

And wouldn't the 5 hand be mirrored?

 

Adam


On Feb 22, 2013, at 12:37 PM, "Charles Butler" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:


I think the card got transmitted wrong. You are right that the last sign
with what you have is MANY. The second column HAD more, love Charles


Charles Butler
[log in to unmask]
240-764-5748
Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Stefan Wöhrmann <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:


From: Stefan Wöhrmann <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 2:02 PM

Hi Charles – what an interesting sign for „birthday“ pulling the ear
downwards twice – 

 

Which signlanguage is this taken from? 

 

You may want to mirror each five-hand in the last sign  - smile  

 

Does it mean “more”?

 

 

All best Stefan

 

  _____  

Von: SignWriting List: Read and Write Sign Languages
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Charles Butler
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 19:28
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE

 


Here you go. 

Charles Butler
[log in to unmask]
240-764-5748
Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Valerie Sutton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


From: Valerie Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 12:10 PM

SignWriting List

February 22, 2013

 

Hello Tini!

Yes, time certainly does fly! Who would have thought, back in Copenhagen in
a dance studio in the 1970's when we first met, that you and I would be
communicating by email so many years later - I am now age 62 …imagine
that…and now you use SignWriting as well as DanceWriting...

 

Thank you for your hugs - hugs back!

 

Val ;-)

 

---------

 

 

On Feb 22, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Pel Tini <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 

Wow, Stefran is right, time sure flies 

Have a wonderful day Valerie and as Stefan says, imagine all your thankful
SW. friends around you. There may not be room in your district for all of
them.

 

Thank you Valerie for everything.

 

with love and a bigggggg huggggg.

 

Henk and Tini.

 

 

On 2013-02-22, at 4:40 AM, Stefan Wöhrmann wrote:

 

Hello Valerie,

 

–        it is time again (already!!!) to send my greeting card.

 

Especially created for this special event!!   Look at this Great Tit – isn`t
it a cute smile ...?

 – Just imagine to have a long table with lots of SW-friends from all over
the world. You make us feel happy! Thank you so much for sharing your
invention with us – and the willingness to discuss it.

 

Happy birthday and all the best!  Take care  -

 

Thanks so much for all what you are doing for us.

 

Stefan ;-)

 

 

 

<happy birthday Valerie Sutton 2013.jpg>

 

 

 

<happybirthday2.png>

<happybirthday1.png>