Print

Print


True, the tense mark should be on both to be true to the person's intent. Sigh. I'll do it later.


Charles Butler

[log in to unmask]

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Sat, 2/23/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 6:14 PM

It doesn't really bother me if the dynamics are there or not. If you are going to put the < on both hands, then you should also put ~ on both as well. But at least the hands are doable now. :-)
Adam
On Feb 23, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Charles Butler wrote:
Sometimes you can't see it for the trees. I don't think that one strictly needs the < but it somehow makes them feel more lively. 



Charles Butler

[log in to unmask]

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Sat, 2/23/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 11:01 AM

Look at the 5 hands. They should be switched. 
Adam
On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:57 AM, "Charles Butler" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Is not the double articulation on the < sufficient? I
 could read it. Or maybe I was intuiting what it was saying. Should the < have been on both hands? 


Charles Butler

[log in to unmask]

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Sat, 2/23/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013, 10:47 AM

It would be the sign MANY. ;-)
Adam
On Feb 23, 2013, at 5:32 AM, "Charles Butler" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I have lost track of what I actually loaded. Here are the two pieces of my email.
 What sign are you referring to? They were all taken off of SignPuddle. Which one needs to be fixed? 



Charles Butler

[log in to unmask]

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Adam Frost <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 3:41 PM

And wouldn't the 5 hand be mirrored?
Adam
On Feb 22, 2013, at 12:37 PM, "Charles Butler" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I think the card got transmitted wrong. You are right that the last sign with
 what you have is MANY. The second column HAD more, love Charles


Charles Butler

[log in to unmask]

240-764-5748

Clear writing moves business forward.

--- On Fri, 2/22/13, Stefan Wöhrmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Stefan Wöhrmann <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: AW: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 2:02 PM






 









Hi Charles – what an
interesting sign for „birthday“ pulling the ear downwards twice –   
Which signlanguage is
this taken from?   
You may want to mirror
each five-hand in the last sign  - smile    
Does it mean “more”?  
  
All best Stefan  
 







Von: SignWriting
List: Read and Write Sign Languages [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Charles Butler

Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Februar
2013 19:28

An:
[log in to unmask]

Betreff: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU
VALERIE 

  
 


 
  Here you go. 

  

  Charles Butler

  [log in to unmask]

  240-764-5748

  Clear writing moves business forward.

  

  --- On Fri, 2/22/13, Valerie Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
  wrote:

  From: Valerie Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

  Subject: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU VALERIE

  To: [log in to unmask]

  Date: Friday, February 22, 2013, 12:10 PM 
  
  SignWriting List 
  February 22, 2013 
  
    
 
  
  Hello Tini! 
  
  Yes, time certainly does fly! Who would have
  thought, back in Copenhagen in a dance studio in the 1970's when we first
  met, that you and I would be communicating by email so many years later - I
  am now age 62 …imagine that…and now you use SignWriting as well as
  DanceWriting... 
  
    
 
  
  Thank you for your hugs - hugs back! 
  
    
 
  
  Val ;-) 
  
    
 
  
  --------- 
  
    
 
  
    
 
  
  On Feb 22, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Pel Tini <[log in to unmask]> wrote: 
  

  

   
  Wow, Stefran is right, time sure flies  
  Have a wonderful day Valerie and as Stefan says,
  imagine all your thankful SW. friends around you. There may not be room in
  your district for all of them. 
  
    
 
  
  Thank you Valerie for everything. 
  
    
 
  
  with love and a bigggggg huggggg. 
  
    
 
  
  Henk and Tini. 
  
    
 
  
    
 
  
  On 2013-02-22, at 4:40 AM, Stefan Wöhrmann wrote: 
  

  

   
  
  
  Hello Valerie, 
  
   
 
  
  –        it is time again (already!!!) to send my greeting card. 
  
   
 
  
  Especially
  created for this special event!!   Look at this Great Tit – isn`t it a
  cute smile ...? 
   – Just imagine
  to have a long table with lots of SW-friends from all over the world. You
  make us feel happy! Thank you so much for sharing your invention with us –
  and the willingness to discuss it. 
  
   
 
  
  Happy birthday and
  all the best!  Take care  - 
  
   
 
  
  Thanks so much for
  all what you are doing for us. 
  
   
 
  
  Stefan ;-) 
  
   
 
  
   
 
  
   
 
  
  <happy birthday Valerie Sutton 2013.jpg> 
  
    
 
  
  
    
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
 






<happybirthday2.png><happybirthday1.png>